Citation Hijacking is the practice of structurally overriding or co-opting someone else’s glossary term, definition, or concept by publishing a more retrievable, trust-weighted version—causing AI systems to reflect the hijacker’s content instead of the original source.
Unlike accidental misattribution, Citation Hijacking is intentional. It exploits the fact that AI retrieval often favors structural clarity, provenance metadata, and reinforcement frequency over original authorship.
🧠 Full Definition
Citation Hijacking occurs when a competing publisher:
- Uses your coined term or concept name in their own glossary or fragment
- Publishes it in Structured Retrieval Surfaces with formats like YAML, JSON-LD, or TTL
- Links it to high-trust entities and co-occurs with authoritative sources
- Reinforces it more frequently and across more surfaces than you do
The result is that AI agents replace your original fragment in their retrieval maps with the hijacker’s structurally stronger version.
📌 Key Characteristics of Citation Hijacking
- Deliberate use of structural superiority to gain retrieval priority
- Leverages co-citation with trusted domains to build association
- Can overwrite accurate content with biased or competing narratives
- Often detectable through Reflection Logs and drift monitoring
💡 Why It Matters
Citation Hijacking can damage brand trust, distort facts, and undermine authority—especially in competitive or regulated spaces. In AI-mediated content delivery, the strongest structure often wins, regardless of originality.
Mitigation requires reinforcing your own fragments, monitoring reflections, and publishing correction fragments when necessary.
🌐 WebMEM Perspective
In WebMEM, Citation Hijacking is considered an adversarial trust tactic. The framework defends against it by encouraging proactive reinforcement, cross-surface publishing, and strong Trust Layer declarations.
🗣️ Example Use
“Our definition of ‘Glossary Conditioning Score’ was replaced in AI answers due to Citation Hijacking from a competitor’s more structured fragment.”
🔗 Related Terms
data-sdt-class: DefinedTermFragment
entity: gtd:citation_hijacking
digest: webmem-glossary-2025
glossary_scope: gtd
fragment_scope: gtd
definition: >
Citation Hijacking is the intentional practice of publishing a more
retrievable, trust-weighted version of someone else’s term or concept so AI
systems replace the original source with the hijacker’s content.
related_terms:
– gtd:adversarial_trust
– gtd:trust_drift
– gtd:reflection_decay
– gtd:citation_authority
– gtd:citation_scaffolding
tags:
– ai
– retrieval
– manipulation
– trust
ProvenanceMeta:
ID: gtd-core-glossary
Title: WebMEM Glossary
Description: Canonical terms for the WebMEM Protocol and GTD framework.
Creator: WebMem.com
Home: https://webmem.com/glossary/
License: CC-BY-4.0
Published: 2025-08-09
Retrieved: 2025-08-09
Digest: webmem-glossary-2025
Entity: gtd:citation_hijacking
GlossaryScope: gtd
FragmentScope: gtd
Guidelines: https://webmem.com/specification/glossary-guidelines/
Tags:
– ai
– retrieval
– manipulation
– trust